“Sections 88 and 89 of the RERA did not implicitly permit the states to create their own legislation creating a parallel regime alongside the RERA which would have not required presidential assent. Hence, it is clear that WB-HIRA did not have presidential assent and was repugnant to RERA under Article 254,” it ruled.
from The Financial Express https://ift.tt/3h07P87
Tuesday, 4 May 2021
Supreme Court strikes down West Bengal law regulating realty sector
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment